• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Technology

Supply Can Kill the Bull

Watch out for the secondaries of these new cloud IPOs
By JIM CRAMER
Mar 23, 2014 | 03:57 PM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: SAP, IBM, ORCL, CRM, LNKD, Z, YELP, WDAY, CSOD, FEYE

It's funny how uninformed so many commentators are when they opine on what kills the bull.

They talk about higher rates as a bull killer, and that's certainly a possibility, but only when rates get so high that we laugh again at paltry dividends. We are nowhere near that. The Fed should have no desire right now to take rates to destructive levels because, as much as the more-negatively-oriented people whine about it, there is no real inflation in system, save beef and guacamole, something you can take as gospel from this Mexican restaurant owner.

Inflation is truly pernicious and has slain some bulls as the Fed crushes it with high rates.

A sudden and nasty decline in economic activity and employment can crush the profits of companies and that's always going to wreck the bull. But if you look at the 2000 dot-com crash, one of the seminal crashes of all time, that was crushed not by hard economic times -- in fact, the S&P 500 did relatively well during that selloff -- but by insider selling. That's the same kind of insider selling that we will most likely get months from now when all of these newly-minted IPOs open the gates for insiders.

Now it might not necessarily end badly. We know that there were a flood of secondaries in many of the successful 2.0 Web companies like LinkedIn (LNKD), Zillow (Z) and Yelp (YELP) and that didn't kill the technology bull.

Plus, there are enough big-capitalization stocks that have been buying stock, not selling it.

Nevertheless, the sheer numbers of cloud and biotech IPOs makes me uncomfortable and worried. For one, there are many aggressive acquirers out there in the cloud space, from IBM (IBM) and SAP (SAP) to Oracle (ORCL) and Salesforce.com (CRM). Why didn't any of them snap up these companies? Why didn't Workday (WDAY) or Cornerstone OnDemany (CSOD) buy Paylocity (PCTY), the company that came public this week that does human capital management software?

Why didn't LinkedIn or Oracle buy Globoforce (THNX), an employee-to-employee social recognition software platform for large enterprises? If it is as good as it says, why wouldn't Salesforce.com want it to complement some of its businesses? Salesforce.com has a robust platform for banking software, why not snare Q2 Holdings (QTWO) that does community bank software, sold as a service of course, which is growing at a 47% clip?

Wouldn't IBM want Amber Road (AMBR), a cloud-based software company that automates importing and exporting? That would seem to be a terrific gateway addition.

I think the answer is that the public markets had develop such an appetite for these kinds of stocks, stocks with revenue growth and no earnings, that the owners of the companies recognized a good thing when they got one. While they didn't do outrageous slivers on the IPOs -- nothing below 10% -- they did nothing to tamp the frenzy that's been going on and it is the frenzy that makes me dislike large parts of this market.

Now, I have to figure that these deals will simply be accidents waiting to happen when the follow-on offerings occur.

I think the FireEye (FEYE) deal awoke the fear in me, a deal filed when the stock was at $96, was priced $82 and then broke down to the $60s and it was like nothing bad happened. That's just the way it was in 2000. We saw secondary after secondary in rapid fashion, all of which were like FireEye: priced high, sold low and then total breakdown with the insiders glad to get something out of their endeavors.

Keep track of this. It won't happen overnight, as there are many months to go and many lock-ups to expire. But this much supply can hurt the established players -- notice how Salesforce.com has been trading? -- as well as the newbies.

I don't like it.

It's negative.

No two ways about it. Supply can kill the bull and certainly did back then.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

Action Alerts PLUS, which Cramer co-manages as a charitable trust, has no positions in the stocks mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Technology | IPOs | Stocks

More from Technology

Cybersecurity Stocks that Lagged in 2020 Could Get Boost from SolarWinds Hack

Eric Jhonsa
Jan 16, 2021 8:00 AM EST

The hack stands to drive an uptick in corporate and government spending to protect both on-premise and cloud assets.

I Find Draganfly's Connection to American Airlines Intriguing

Timothy Collins
Jan 15, 2021 12:29 PM EST

Drones are set to become a bigger and bigger part of the commercial world and our day-to-day lives.

Twitter Shares Are Just Plain Overvalued

Jim Collins
Jan 15, 2021 11:45 AM EST

Here's where Jack Dorsey's ship will start to sink.

World's Third-Largest Smartphone Maker Added to U.S. Military Blacklist

Alex Frew McMillan
Jan 15, 2021 8:30 AM EST

Xiaomi shares plunged in Hong Kong trade Friday after the Department of Defense said the mobile-phone maker is part of China's 'military-civil fusion'.

TSMC's Big 2021 Capex Budget Might Have Something to Do With Intel

Eric Jhonsa
Jan 14, 2021 3:29 PM EST

While expected demand from clients such as Apple and AMD is also probably motivating TSMC to invest more, the size of its 2021 capex budget suggests other factors are also at play.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:01 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    When it's time to sell, will you act or freeze?
  • 08:35 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Wednesday Morning Fibocall for 1/13/2021

    Lower highs... SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/8/2...
  • 08:07 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Tuesday Morning Fibocall for 1/12/2021

    Watch if the recent trend of lower highs continues...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login