• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Doug Kass
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Jim Cramer
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Stocks

Insiders Are Crazy About Boulder Brands

But another name in the sector doesn't face the same valuation problems.
By MEENA KRISHNAMSETTY Mar 08, 2013 | 01:56 PM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: BDBD, WWAV

Several insiders at Boulder Brands (BDBD), a food company that owns the Smart Balance brand and also provides a number of other food products conforming to dairy-free, gluten-free and vegan diets, have bought shares in the last couple weeks, with the most recent purchases generally coming between $8.70 and $8.90 per share.

For the full year of 2012, revenue was up 35% from its levels in 2011, though some of this growth was the result of acquisitions. Boulder paid about $70 million for Glutino Food Group in August 2011 and about $130 million for Udi's Healthy Foods in July 2012. This compares to the current market capitalization of about $540 million (with an average of more than 800,000 shares traded per day, providing plenty of volume). The company has been investing heavily in the attractive diet compliant food industry and appears to have changed its name to reflect that shift in emphasis. The acquisitions have also meant higher costs, including SGA expenses. Operating income was down slightly as a result, and up only 9% if we completely ignore merger-related costs. In addition, the company's interest expenses increased as it took out debt to fund the acquisitions, with the result being a significant decrease in earnings even if we adjust for the merger items.

Earnings per share for last year were only 7 cents and even if we add back merger expenses the stock price still seems high in relation to actual results. Analyst expectations are for 28 cents per share this year, which would make for a current-year P/E of 32. Of course, Boulder has the potential to improve its earnings by cutting costs (the synergies that are always supposed to accompany acquisitions) and a number of specialty verticals in the food industry have been seeing high growth. With Smart Balance actually experiencing a decline in sales last year (that unit still was still responsible for the majority of revenue for the year, though with the midyear addition of Udi's it's possible that the company's Natural segment currently has a higher run rate), the other operations are key to justifying the current valuation.

It's true that this type of business has bright prospects, but we still find the valuation challenging. WhiteWave Foods (WWAV), recently spun out from Dean Foods as a dairy substitute and organic dairy foods company, trades at 23x expected earnings for this year. That company should benefit from similar market trends as Boulder and yet even as a pure play in a similar vertical it trades at a discount to a company that still gets much of its business from a negative-growth segment. The Natural segment doesn't only have to grow faster than WhiteWave, it has to grow fast enough so that Boulder can grow faster than WhiteWave. We think that implies very high expectations on the synergies front.

Still, the breadth of insider purchases at Boulder is quite impressive and we'd certainly avoid shorting a stock with so much confidence from company officers and board members (18% of the outstanding shares are held short). Yet the current market price already includes a good deal of earnings growth and seems to be anticipating much better performance for the Natural business than at least one prominent peer. As a result, we would not buy at this time but might revisit Boulder after its next quarter's results to see what progress it has made on cutting costs.

-- Written by Matt Doiron and Meena Krishnamsetty.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, the author had no positions in any of the securities mentioned.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Stocks

More from Stocks

The Indexes Hide the Rumbling Underneath

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 25, 2021 5:02 PM EST

As the market appeared ho-hum on the surface, much was shaking underneath and traders got a jolt.

Now Viewing: AMC Trade

Mark Sebastian
Jan 25, 2021 3:49 PM EST

Here's a play in AMC amid its Monday move.

Jim Cramer: This Is a Market of Stocks, Not a Stock Market

Jim Cramer
Jan 25, 2021 3:22 PM EST

With few exceptions, there isn't a stock that could bring down this market.

The Most Notable Action Right Now Is Some Huge Short Squeezes

James "Rev Shark" DePorre
Jan 25, 2021 12:26 PM EST

Increased volatility is a warning sign, but it's very likely that we will see quite a bit of it before the big turn finally does occur.

AMC Is a Real Showstopper

Timothy Collins
Jan 25, 2021 11:50 AM EST

Let's look at how to play the frothy action on AMC Entertainment holdings.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 09:52 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    INDU/DIA 20 DMA

    Fibocall: The DIA has the 20 DMA @ 307.81 and w...
  • 08:04 AM EST GARY BERMAN

    Monday Morning Fibocall for 1/25/2021

    SPX (Long-Term View) The 1/21/21 NEW high @ 3861...
  • 11:01 AM EST JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    I discuss price targets in my Saturday column.
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2021 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login