• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Markets
  3. / China

Trump Is Right About U.S. Trade Deals -- and They're Even Worse for the Environment

Carbon taxes in industrialized countries have increased the global warming problem. 
By MATT HORWEEN
Mar 07, 2016 | 12:00 PM EST

Have trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and China and other emerging market countries joining the World Trade Organization accelerated the effects of global warming? In my view, yes, they have.

I agree with Donald Trump that trade agreements have been bad for U.S. workers and our economy. These deals have been very good for employers with unions who were then able to shutter their U.S. plants and replace production with facilities in Mexico, China, India and other emerging markets, where labor laws and pollution control are almost non-existent. Consumers of steel, aluminum and copper have benefited from metals production moving to emerging markets.

However, I have not heard of any of these deals resulting in a trade surplus for the U.S. When I worked for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), it appeared to me that trade agreements where a part of our foreign aid program, in addition to allowing manufacturing companies to increase offshore production.

I'm surprised that Trump has not talked about the terrible toll that trade deals have had on the ecology and people of China, as well as other emerging markets. All of these countries are exempt from the Kyoto Protocol and as a result are not burdened by pollution standards. Between 10% and 20% of the air pollution on the U.S. West Coast comes from China.

There is a massive amount of pollution in China coming from many sources. It's in the air, in the water, and even in the soil now. Some experts say that millions of people are at risk of an early death because of China's unbridled push to take over so much of the manufacturing of the industrialized world.

The graph below shows the increase in the global mean surface temperature; it is clear that the temperature started to climb around the time NAFTA became the law of the land -- and then really took off once China entered the WTO in December 2001. George H.W. Bush was president then, but the Clinton administration negotiated the agreements allowing China to enter the WTO. Many people at the time complained that the trade deals would cause job losses, as well as pollution.

Source: Wikipedia

I contend that one of effects of carbon taxes in industrialized countries has been to increase the problem of global greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts by Europe and other industrialized nations have been like clapping with one hand. Industrialized countries forcing heavy industries to flee to the emerging world made matters much worse.

Instead of levying carbon taxes on themselves, industrialized countries should impose them on imports from the real emitters of greenhouse gases and pollution. It was not just cheap labor that attracted the multinationals to use China for manufacturing -- it was also the ability to avoid pollution controls. It is true that some multinationals insisted that their plants be up to date on pollution controls, but companies that just outsourced commodities or production had little control over the environmental standards at the manufacturing facility.

It appears that the Clinton administration did not prepare a useful environmental impact analysis before proposing NAFTA and letting China into the WTO. Had this been done, the administration might have figured out that when you take more than half a billion people out of poverty who had almost no carbon footprint, global-warming gases are sure to increase substantially.

The shutting down of vast amounts of industrial capacity by industrialized countries did not offset the massive increase of greenhouse emissions in China and India. It is interesting that China was still using coal-fired locomotives when they entered the WTO. In fact, China did not stop manufacturing coal-fired locomotives until 2002. The "mother's milk" of manufacturing is electricity and, to this day, India and China power their electric grids with coal. This alone has caused massive pollution in both countries and contributed to tremendously to global warming as more and more coal-fired generating plants were needed to produce all the goods previously manufactured in the industrialized world.

The Clinton administration touted the great benefits of so-called free trade with emerging markets. It told us we were going to become a post-industrial society and that the markets that would benefit from the transfer of  manufacturing would buy our high-tech and agricultural products, our construction equipment and our intellectual property in the entertainment industry.

You would be surprised by how much influence the U.S. agricultural sector has in trade negotiations. Many times it is mostly about opening markets for U.S. products and manufacturing takes a back seat along with protecting U.S. jobs.

Most pundits, economists and academics said the U.S. population would go to college and become employees in banking and other service industries. I do not think they thought about the impact of the Internet -- and they certainly did not realize what would happen when over 500 million people in China and India alone moved from subsistence farming to living and working in cities with a very much larger carbon footprint.

I remember the TV news reports showing how people rode bicycles around Beijing and how quaint China was. At the beginning of the massive push for growth in China, many workers lived in dormitories and went home once or twice a year. Cities needed housing stock before the Chinese would permit a worker to move to his new workplace.

Eventually, China had a massive building boom and now hundreds of workers have urbanized themselves and require a huge amounts of energy to support them both at work and at home. Then the bicycles started to disappear and motorcycles and autos began to replace them.

Auto sales in China topped 24 million units in 2015 -- the most in the world. As we all know, automobiles with internal combustion engines emit a very large amount of greenhouse gases. The growing Chinese middle class now travels on cruises and takes flights all over the world. Bringing people out of poverty makes global warming worse. I am not saying that's a bad thing, but there needs to be a plan not to destroy the environment while bringing a better life to hundreds of millions of people.

Right now, the industrialized world is giving emerging economies the money to remedy emissions that their own policies have created or made worse, while the former industrial economies are clueless as to what to do about the situation. A chart showing the increase in the world's billionaires would probably look a lot like a graph of the rising world's temperature.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.
TAGS: China | Markets

More from China

Alibaba Shares Spurt Higher, but Drags on the Online Giant Lurk

Alex Frew McMillan
May 27, 2022 9:14 AM EDT

China's ongoing fight against COVID threatens to make the going tough for companies that do business there.

Quad Meets as North Korean Missiles, Chinese and Russian Bombers Fly By

Alex Frew McMillan
May 25, 2022 9:05 AM EDT

Joe Biden concluded his first Asian spin as president with a meeting of the Quad partnership, which is expanding well beyond its original security focus.

Alibaba Is Sold out on the Downside

Bruce Kamich
May 23, 2022 1:26 PM EDT

China at a bearish extreme is an opportunity.

Biden Promises U.S. Military Will Defend Taiwan if Attacked

Alex Frew McMillan
May 23, 2022 7:51 AM EDT

Surprising even his own staff, the U.S. president overshadowed the launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity.

Biden Visits Korea and Japan With Rare Opportunity

Alex Frew McMillan
May 20, 2022 9:00 AM EDT

On his first Asia spin as president, Joe Biden will find a surprisingly warm welcome, and is due to launch an economic framework for US-Asia relations.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 10:58 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    "The Tremendous Power of the Sell Button"
  • 02:46 PM EDT STEPHEN GUILFOYLE

    We're Shedding Some of This Holding on Strength

    Check out the Stocks Under $10 portfolio here!
  • 11:33 AM EDT PETER TCHIR

    Thoughts Ahead of the Fed Minutes

    Recent economic and earnings issues are convincing...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login