• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Home
  • Daily Diary
  • Asset Class
    • U.S. Equity
    • Fixed Income
    • Global Equity
    • Commodities
    • Currencies
  • Sector
    • Basic Materials
    • Consumer Discretionary
    • Consumer Staples
    • Energy
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare
    • Industrials
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • Telecom Services
    • Transportation
    • Utilities
  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Video
    • Columnist Conversations
    • Best Ideas
    • Stock of the Day
  • Street Notes
  • Authors
    • Bruce Kamich
    • Doug Kass
    • Jim "Rev Shark" DePorre
    • Helene Meisler
    • Jonathan Heller
    • - See All -
  • Options
  • RMPIA
  • Switch Product
    • Action Alerts PLUS
    • Quant Ratings
    • Real Money
    • Real Money Pro
    • Retirement
    • Stocks Under $10
    • TheStreet
    • Top Stocks
    • Trifecta Stocks
  1. Home
  2. / Investing
  3. / Energy

Welcome Back, Coal

Now cheaper than natural gas, it is the fuel of choice for utilities. 
By GLENN WILLIAMS Feb 22, 2014 | 10:30 AM EST
Stocks quotes in this article: CPN, NRG, EXC, NEE

Coal is back. For almost a year, utilities have been using less natural gas in favor of more coal. It is about economics. The price of coal is now cheaper than natural gas. As long as gas prices remain high, coal will be the economic fuel for utilities.

The Energy Information Administration's (EIA) most recent report captures fuel data through November 2013. By converting EIA's raw data to percentages, a pattern emerges:

Year-over-year, U.S. utilities produced essentially the same amount of electric power. The difference was slightly less than two-tenths of 1%.

The pattern suggests coal and renewable energy pushed natural gas out of the power market. Natural gas was down 3.2%, coal and renewable energy was up 2.8%.

Monthly data confirm the trend. On a monthly basis, natural gas lagged 2012 all year:

Like automobiles, power plants have varying degrees of efficiencies. Within the natural gas family of power plants, efficiencies can range from 6,000 British thermal units of fuel per kilowatt-hour (Btu/kWh) of electricity to 12,000 Btu/kWh. As a result, efficient gas turbines use half the amount of fuel as gas boilers to produce the same amount of electricity.

While a little more complicated, the same is true with the coal family of power plants. With coal, the complication is the variability of the fuel. In 2013, it appears efficient coal plants pushed inefficient gas plants out of the market. In addition, coal's push was assisted by renewable energy.

As utility executives have warned repeatedly, natural gas prices are unstable. Prices jump on weather, on supplies and on traders' whims. Most important, electric utilities find delivered prices more volatile. Natural gas pipelines are frequently constrained and unable to deliver marginal gas.

The price difference between Henry Hub (or NYMEX) prices and delivered prices can be 10- or 20-to-1. While Henry Hub prices have drifted upward to $6 dollars per million btu, citygate prices have exploded to $50 or $120 in major population centers. At these local prices, the only way a gas generator can make money is if there is a spark spread (power price minus the cost of natural gas). Again, it comes down to relative efficiencies: The spark spread exists only if there are less efficient gas plants that have cleared the power markets. Consequently, citygate prices, not necessarily Henry Hub prices, are driving natural gas out of local power markets.

Companies such as Calpine (CPN) depend on natural gas to fuel most of its generating fleet. However, most of Calpine's fleet is made up of efficient gas turbines (combined cycle gas turbines). Its assets should find adequate spark spread that is independent of the local price of natural gas.

By comparison, coal prices tend to be stable. Through good and bad weather, the delivered price of coal tends to be consistent. Coal deliveries are generally not constrained. Even if they were to become constrained, most utilities store 60 to 90 days of coal on site.

Companies such as NRG Energy (NRG) depend on cola to fuel a large percentage of their generating fleet. Like Calpine, NRG's fleet has been culled to retain highly efficient units. Its dark spread (power price minus the cost of coal), plus any capacity payments should keep their units profitable. With natural gas on the margin, its profitability should improve.

The same is true with nuclear power. Nuclear fuel prices are very stable. The average nuclear power plant has months of fuel stored on site. With natural gas prices up, companies such as Exelon (EXC) should see stronger margins.

Renewable energy in the form of wind power and solar power require no fuel to produce their electric power. Consequently, higher natural gas prices deliver higher margins. For example, NextEra Energy's (NEE) wind farms should see higher earnings.

As natural gas prices go up, more gas turbines will become marginalized. If prices remain high, then spark spreads will likely deteriorate. The result is a return to the old days, where the less efficient gas turbines are forced to sit on the bench.

This winter's cold weather was a wake-up call. EIA's data are from before the severe weather hit eastern power markets. The winter of 2014 will tell a different story. We already know natural gas prices reached historic levels. Dark spreads will likely be even stronger.

With gas on the rise, coal utilities may reconsider plans to retire marginal plants. In addition, regional power grids may offer new incentives to retain coal in their mix. New England's power grid has already asked its largest coal plant to hang around beyond 2017. So far, privately held Brayton Point owners have declined.

It has become clear that if a massive amount of coal exits the market, power prices could become volatile. Worse, grid reliability could deteriorate. While there remains uncertainty, the coal story may not be as bad as first reported.

Get an email alert each time I write an article for Real Money. Click the "+Follow" next to my byline to this article.

At the time of publication, Glenn Williams had no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

Glenn wishes to acknowledge that for months, Real Money writer Tim Melvin predicted coal would remain a viable fuel for the utility industry.

TAGS: Investing | U.S. Equity | Energy

More from Energy

This Energy Play Should Turn Out A-'OKE'

Bret Jensen
Jul 3, 2022 7:30 AM EDT

Let's learn how to make an enhanced yield trade in Oneok.

Welcome to Second Semester on Wall Street, Here's How to Make the Grade

Jim Collins
Jul 1, 2022 4:36 PM EDT

Think you can own big tech? You might just get an 'F' for that. Here's what will get you on the other side of this year.

The Market, It's Such a Gas!

Helene Meisler
Jul 1, 2022 6:00 AM EDT

Commodities like gas came down and people finally noticed. Let's check on that diesel, 30-year bonds and more.

Want to Save Your Retirement Fund? Tune Out the Talking Heads

Jim Collins
Jun 30, 2022 3:14 PM EDT

The first half of this year has been ugly. But we could have seen what would happen to Netflix, Tesla and Meta...

OPEC+ Opens the Spigot, but Are We Just Repeating Mistakes of 2008?

Maleeha Bengali
Jun 30, 2022 12:26 PM EDT

As we see this increase in oil production get rubberstamped, we must remember that demand never moves in a straight line.

Real Money's message boards are strictly for the open exchange of investment ideas among registered users. Any discussions or subjects off that topic or that do not promote this goal will be removed at the discretion of the site's moderators. Abusive, insensitive or threatening comments will not be tolerated and will be deleted. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Email

CANCEL
SUBMIT

Email sent

Thank you, your email to has been sent successfully.

DONE

Oops!

We're sorry. There was a problem trying to send your email to .
Please contact customer support to let us know.

DONE

Please Join or Log In to Email Our Authors.

Email Real Money's Wall Street Pros for further analysis and insight

Already a Subscriber? Login

Columnist Conversation

  • 07:34 AM EDT PAUL PRICE

    A $525,000 Vote of Confidence on Macerich (MAC)

  • 09:49 AM EDT JAMES "REV SHARK" DEPORRE

    This Weekend on Real Money

    Stop Wishing, Hoping, and Praying and Take Control...
  • 07:59 PM EDT PAUL PRICE

    Very Good Quarterly Numbers From Bassett Furniture (BSET)

    Bassett Furniture blew right through analysts es...
  • See More

COLUMNIST TWEETS

  • A Twitter List by realmoney
About Privacy Terms of Use

© 1996-2022 TheStreet, Inc., 225 Liberty Street, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10281

Need Help? Contact Customer Service

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data & Company fundamental data provided by FactSet. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions Group.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

FactSet calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.

Compare Brokers

Please Join or Log In to manage and receive alerts.

Follow Real Money's Wall Street Pros to receive real-time investing alerts

Already a Subscriber? Login