Tebow Time for the Eurozone?

 | Dec 19, 2011 | 11:00 AM EST  | Comments
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print

This commentary originally appeared on Dec.19 at 8:12 a.m. EST on Real Money Pro – for access to all of legendary hedge funder manager Doug Kass's strategies and commentaries, click here.

After Europe's leaders and central bankers misdiagnosed the magnitude of the continent's debt crisis and after responding in an ineffectual and almost effete manner, the great unraveling of the eurozone is on our doorstep.

The threat of decomposition of the EU has trumped evidence of an improving U.S. economy and has resulted in (historically) low stock market valuations, restricting any upward progress in share prices and (more importantly) raising the specter of frozen credit availability and a deepening recession in Europe that may be exported to the U.S., China and the rest of the world. To many (ratings agencies, investors, etc.), the hopelessness of the European economic situation resembles a Franz Kafka work.

Fitch was particularly cheerless as following the EU Summit on Dec. 9-Dec. 10, the ratings agency concluded that a comprehensive solution to the eurozone crisis is technically and politically beyond reach. Despite positive commitments by EU leaders at the summit, particularly an acceleration in the creation of the European Stability Mechanism and downplaying the role of private-sector involvement, the concerns held by Fitch prior to the summit have not been materially eased. Fitch particularly emphasized the absence of a credible financial backstop and the need for a more active and explicit commitment from the ECB "to mitigate the risk of self-fulfilling liquidity crises for potentially illiquid but solvent members of the EU." While Fitch was upbeat that all 17 EU members have moved toward fiscal consolidation, it remained downbeat on the systemic nature of the crisis's impact on regional economic and financial stability in the short-, intermediate- and long-term time frames.

Last week, the IMF's managing director Christine Lagarde voiced similar concerns that Europe's economic and credit center will not hold.

Despite the anxiety in the markets and the downside risk to the world's economic growth entwined in the European debt crisis, I remain of the view that a credible plan to stem the debt crisis in Europe has just begun and that European and global leaders and central bankers will all come to their senses and intervene in a massive way.

To me, the chances are awfully good. After all, the alternative is unimaginable for the eurozone's economic health and political stability.

In markets, politics, society and sports, change always come out of extreme conditions.

Markets: Bull markets are borne out of poor economic news, uncertainty and dour investor sentiment, while bear markets are borne out of good economic news, certainty and excessive investor confidence.

Politics: Political change often occurs during economic reversals (2008 Democratic tsunami and the Tea Party) and foreign policy disappointment.

Society: Social change is often the outgrowth of economic dissatisfaction (the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street).

Sports: Team lineups are changed and coaches are replaced when performance fails and win/loss records don't meet expectations. (The NFL's Denver Broncos were 2-5 two months ago when quarterback Tim Tebow got the call to start. The rest is history. Six straight wins before yesterday's loss to the New England Patriots, and the Broncos still hold the divisional lead at 8-6.)

So, I expect change will continue to occur in Europe, though the path will be bumpy, and some important changes have already been agreed upon. More will come.

Thus far ignored by the world's stock markets are some positive elements of the EU summit meeting, which, though slow-moving (should have been expected!), appear to have measurably taken tail risk off the table for Europe. The first steps of greater fiscal integration and sanctions against countries that violate agreed-upon debt and deficit rules have been taken and addressed. As a start, each of the 17 countries in the EU will introduce balanced budget amendments coupled with structural deficits capped at 0.5% of GDP (with cyclical deviations to 3% of GDP allowed). Automatic correction mechanisms will be triggered if member countries violate the debt and deficit rules.

Despite the (justified) gloom and doom in Europe, investors have ignored the mildly positive short-term action in sovereign debt yields last week. (At negative sentiment extremes, as was the case of the U.S. stock market in January 2009-February 2009, there is always disbelief at an inflection point of change.)

Ironically, European bond yields (excluding Italy's 10-year note) fell across the board and across the curve last week. Spanish two-year yields move to the lowest level in seven months, and yields have halved since November. France's two-year yield is the lowest in 13 months. According to Miller Tabak's Peter Boockvar, the euro basis swap and Euribor/OIS spread dropped last week. European economic statistics, too, were better than expected as reflected in a modest tick up in Germany's ZEW six-month expectations outlook and a slight improvement in the eurozone's manufacturing and services index (from 47 to 47.9).

The eyes of investors around the world remain fixated on the policymakers in Europe. I continue to be more optimistic than most that (out of necessity) the needed and more dramatic policy initiatives will take the form of large-scale ECB intervention in the sovereign bond markets (in the weeks and months ahead) aimed to set in motion a positive feedback loop between investors' bond buying and the receding risk of sovereign default.

Consider Cumberland Advisors' Dave Kotok's view of the current condition in Europe and the likely solution to the debt crisis over there. He shared the following comments with me in an email over the weekend:

One conclusion is becoming evident. The central banks of the world are continuing to coordinate their efforts to meet liquidity requirements under nearly every circumstance. They have determined that they must keep the functioning of the world's financial system unimpaired. To do that, liquidity has to increase, and the manner in which they accomplish this is to expand their balance sheets. A Lehman-type liquidity constraint will not be permitted to occur again if the central banks can avoid it.

In addition, on detailed examination of the balance sheets, you can see how the actions of the central bank on the asset side are balanced by rising reserve deposits on the liability side. In other words, a central bank goes into the market, buys a debt instrument or otherwise acquires an asset, pays for it or lends to a bank, and the bank then pledges it -- in any case, the central bank creates a reserve or cash that within hours is redeposited at the central bank as an excess reserve deposit. There is no credit multiplier in the monetary system when the newly created central bank money is circulated right back to the central bank.

Essentially, the commercial banks within each currency zone have excess reserves. They have excess liquidity, and they are electing to redeposit those reserves back with the safety of the central bank rather than do something else. That behavior reflects the uncertainty that exists throughout the financial system. For example, in the United States, a commercial bank can deposit excess reserves with the Federal Reserve and receive an annualized interest rate of 0.25% or 25 basis points. The commercial bank could do other things as well. In the United States, we see a very large sum reflected in the liabilities side of our chart stack, in a darker green color that shows the huge excess reserve deposit at the Federal Reserve. Banks in the U.S. are not engaged in the expansion of credit. They are redepositing their excess reserves at 25 basis points. The same thing is happening in most of the world. That is now apparent and easy to see in the color coding of the G4 central bank liability side of the balance sheets.

Liquidity, liquidity, liquidity. That is the theme by which the central banks are operating today.

Liquidity and solvency are two different issues. They should not be confused with one another. Greece remains insolvent as a sovereign country. In Europe and in the rest of the world, however, the insolvency is not being allowed to impart a liquidity crunch. The recent use of swaps and other vehicles to enhance liquidity continues to be expanded by the central banks of the world. Santa Claus is coming, and his name is Bernanke, Draghi, Shirakawa or King. Whether or not their noses are red remains to be seen.

In summary, the consensus view is that structurally swollen debt loads and the disparate (legal, political and economic) interests of the 17 members of the EU preclude a near- or intermediate- term resolution of the debt crisis. There is near unanimity that the recent timid-and-tame policy response will never be structurally capable or willing of adopting the necessary shock-and-awe resolution that the U.S. provided (as a template) two to three years ago.

My view is that the consensus might prove to be too pessimistic.

For now, the moves by the EU have not resolved the debt crisis, and the associated uncertainty will constrain the upside to risk markets. Nevertheless, with tail risk in Europe reduced, an improving domestic economic recovery, weak investor sentiment, reasonable valuations, decent corporate profit and dividend growth, a market-friendly Fed (joined by an easing of monetary policy by central bankers around the world), share prices can grind higher until more aggressive European policy is introduced (which I fully expect) in the form of non-EU countries pitching in.

In the fullness of time, I predict more aggressive policy, escalated sovereign debt purchases (see ECB President Mario Draghi's comments yesterday in Financial Times) and a broader country participation in the IMF will be forthcoming in response to the crisis in Europe.

The likelihood of these long passes of future and more dynamic market stabilizing steps could produce Tebow time sooner than later for the eurozone and for the world's stock markets that have labored under the shroud of a debt contagion.

Investors may want to own equities before these steps are implemented.  For if the hapless Denver Broncos (of September and October) can launch its Tebow-style turnaround, so can the eurozone excoriate from the debt crisis by adopting more dramatic initiatives.

Columnist Conversations

HLF closed Wednesday trading at $43.63, down small with IV30™ down 3.2%. Conclusion HLF is down 40% sinc...
The Russell 2000 has led the broader market lower and today it returned to its 2014 lows, the bottom end of a ...
Here are the next potential support decisions to watch in SPX cash. Note that the current decline is only sim...

BEST IDEAS

REAL MONEY'S BEST IDEAS

Columnist Tweets

BROKERAGE PARTNERS

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.


TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.