Digging into the 5 Dow Laggards

 | Nov 29, 2013 | 1:19 PM EST  | Comments
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print
Stock quotes in this article:

ibm

,

cat

,

xom

,

csco

,

t

And then there were five.

Just five companies in the Dow that are well behind the market, unable to struggle above double digits for the year. It's a tough benchmark. Many of the stocks in the averages are up huge. It's been a standout year.

But IBM (IBM), Caterpillar (CAT), AT&T (T), ExxonMobil (XOM) and Cisco (CSCO) are all up less than double digits, with IBM down 6% and Caterpillar down 5% and AT&T up 5% and Exxon and Cisco up 8%.

So, I think it is time to drill down at these underperformers and see what needs to be done.

First, IBM is being challenged by the cloud. It's book of business isn't in tune with the simple, inexpensive nature of the cloud and the whole Watson thing, the race for most powerful, analytic computer, means nothing in this day in age where there are many companies that provide excellent data analytics. IBM offers the fabled one-stop shop and information technology outfits are increasingly going a la carte, which I saw at DreamForce, the Salesforce.com (CRM) celebration of everything that is not IBM. Increasingly, IBM is perceived as being irrelevant and not offering a bargain to companies. Heavy hardware is unnecessary. IBM spends much of its free cash flow buying back stock to make the earnings with subpar or no revenue growth. It is a giant cyclical company without any growth.

I have to tell you that if Warren Buffett weren't in this stock it might be lower -- dramatically lower. Its revenues have been, basically, flat for four years while all that has happened in that time is it has shrunken its share count to about 1.098 billion from about 1.278 billion in that same period. No real growth. I just see little reason to own the stock without a game-changing acquisition. It is a tech company with no mobile, social or cloud business to speak off and the more it goes into the cloud the worse it will be for the company's margins.

Caterpillar is all management. The mistakes here are legion. The acquisition of Bucyrus at the high for coal mining equipment for $7.6 billion, top of the market prices, and then buying another company, ERA, for about $650 million that it later had to write off almost the entire purchase amount because of fraud. These acquisitions are squarely at the feet of CEO Doug Olberhelman who belongs, candidly, on the Wall of Shame. Why? Because I think this stock would jump huge if he would retire because, despite being accurate about the forecast for the world, he has continually pumped out too much inventory in the very places his people tell him can't sustain the extra equipment.

Plus, his competitors are doing quite well. Terex (TEX), a second-rate Caterpillar, is up 30%. United Rentals (URI), a huge buyer of CAT equipment, has rallied 50% this year. Cummins (CMI), a challenged engine maker, has still been able to increase 22%. This is all on Olberhelman and I don't think the situation can be fixed until he departs. The board seems totally brain dead, so don't expect a change any time soon.

AT&T's a tough one. It's super-slow growing with a huge cash flow, but this year has been a real disappointment. I think that the endless buying back of stock and slow dividend increases are not producing the kinds of returns that are expected from this great American company. It needs to do an acquisition. It needs to go to Europe and take advantage of low prices and truly become international again. Or it needs to get into the race to buy one of these cable companies that are for sale. Barring that, it could go national in the home security business. No matter what, it can't keep doing what it's doing because it is just not growing enough to justify inclusion into anyone's portfolio.

Now a 5% yield's going to keep anyone from selling this stock. But if I want yield there are plenty of places to put it. There's nothing wrong with a timely acquisition, though, to really get this one going and I think that CEO Randall Stephenson gets that.

ExxonMobil? What can I say? It's a buy. The stock ran because of the aggressive purchasing by Warren Buffett, which is pretty amazing when you consider that this company has so many shares that it is hard to believe that anyone can move it. Then again, it's been shrinking share count pretty aggressively, going to 4.39 billion from 4.89 billion since the end of 2010. That's a real takeout.

For years, Exxon seems to have lagged in its exploration and production, but this last quarter was uniquely good. My hope it is the first of many from a company that is still the most respected in the industry. One way that it could certainly help itself is install natural gas pumps at its stations, because it is the biggest producer of natural gas in this country. Another way would be to try to export the stuff by tying in with one of the companies trying to export American natural gas. But I believe this stock could be a huge one for 2014 and I would buy it aggressively into what I think is a momentary West Texas dip.

Which leaves us with Cisco. Here's a company that reported the worst quarter in the Dow Jones average, despite doing a massive restructuring in the previous quarter that should have heralded a better turnaround. I still, for the life of me, can't figure out why it didn't preannounce its horrendous situation, especially when considering the drop off it forecast for next year.

I think Cisco's getting its butt kicked by pretty much everyone lately. I spoke to Palo Alto Networks (PANW) the other day and the company's simply carving up Cisco on its security offerings. I believe that Ciena's (CIEN) winning the war here as is Juniper (JNPR).

The solution?

John Chambers. He has to go. He's been unable to turn around this operation despite offering what many think is superior technology. The ala carte companies are crushing the end-to-end solution companies like Cisco. There's only one way out: break the company up and that's something that Chambers, who built the company, can't do. He's too stubborn. I think new blood here would invigorate the company and bring it back into the fold of real growth technology plays. Here, again, the endless buybacks at high prices are doing nothing for the cause.

It's a motley crew of which only Exxon's worth a buy. But with changes and acquisitions that can change. Unfortunately, I just don't see any of these changes happening any time soon.

Columnist Conversations

Apple was off $6.95 (1.31%) in regular trading but is up over $37 (~7%) in the after markets, after announcing...
You're likely aware of next week's Fed meeting, but we want to remind you that the equity markets have a very ...
Market finally pulling back a bit after six straight days of gains. Small caps are behaving worse than their ...
IBM
IBM is an action alerts plus.com name and I think that it represents great value versus where it will be next ...

BEST IDEAS

REAL MONEY'S BEST IDEAS

Columnist Tweets

BROKERAGE PARTNERS

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.


TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.