My Take on Barron's Take on Energy

 | Aug 06, 2012 | 12:43 PM EDT  | Comments
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print
Stock quotes in this article:

xom

,

cvx

,

cop

,

tot

,

RDS

Barron's cover story this weekend was a comprehensive look at energy, chock full of observations and recommendations. I tend to dislike comprehensive pieces, as they tend to simplify what is indeed very complex. But this piece had some good ideas as well as some bad ones. 

Take their very quick analysis of the major integrated energy companies, like Exxon (XOM), Chevron (CVX), Conoco-Phillips (COP), Royal Dutch Shell (RDS) and Total (TOT). Analysis of these companies used the three most widely available statistics that most oil analysts use: reserve growth, equivalent energy production and dividend history. Analyzing these gave Barron's a clear choice in Chevron, one with which I would argue.

There is a strong bias inside the energy sector for dividends right now and the stock prices are reflecting that. While I can't fault any investor for fleeing towards dividends in this unsettled market, it does not make integrated stocks the best value in the space, nor particularly Chevron the best of those dividend payers. Indeed, the outlook of crude and nat gas prices was not even considered in their analysis. For this and other reasons I much prefer RDS and XOM to CVX, both recommendations I've made in the past.

Barron's did well pointing out the deep value in independent E and P companies, which I entirely agree with. Compared to the majors, independents like Apache (APA) and Anadarko (APC) are grossly undervalued, but I need a better price on both considering their recent quarterly reports and will wait for them. 

But Barron's dropped the ball in their trashing of natural gas stocks. They used the ridiculous price-to-sales metric to determine their relative value. Wow. It's hard not to have an inflated P/S number when natural gas has been sitting at historic lows of under $2/mcf for most of the last two quarters. By that backwards-thinking analysis, you'd likely be loaded with Apache shares above $140 when oil was trading over $130 a barrel in 2008 because, gosh, the price-to-sales were so cheap. 

No, the thesis with natural gas is that prices of all commodities cycle and we need to take advantage of prices that are cycling downwards, as natural gas has done this year. Any analyst who really believes that we are destined for dirt-cheap dry gas prices for as far as the eye can see has little perspective on commodities and less on historical natural gas volatility.  Believe me, all the economic and market forces I know will inevitably drive gas prices higher and their stocks with them. 

I subscribe to Barron's because their information and analysis are solidly created and their writing is terrific, but as stock pickers their record is dismal. As a source of ideas for further work, Barron's is very worthwhile and one of my treasured tools. But as an advisor I take much of what they say with a grain of salt and you should too.

Columnist Conversations

Apple was off $6.95 (1.31%) in regular trading but is up over $37 (~7%) in the after markets, after announcing...
You're likely aware of next week's Fed meeting, but we want to remind you that the equity markets have a very ...
Market finally pulling back a bit after six straight days of gains. Small caps are behaving worse than their ...
IBM
IBM is an action alerts plus.com name and I think that it represents great value versus where it will be next ...

BEST IDEAS

REAL MONEY'S BEST IDEAS

Columnist Tweets

BROKERAGE PARTNERS

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.


TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.