Apple and Google's Very Different Approaches to China Have Huge Financial Consequences

 | Jul 14, 2017 | 8:07 PM EDT
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print
Stock quotes in this article:

aapl

,

googl

,

cha

,

FB

,

bidu

To say that Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Alphabet Inc./Google (GOOGL) have taken very different approaches to engaging China in recent years is quite the understatement. A new announcement from Apple drives home just how different the company's mainland Chinese strategy remains from Google's, as its sales to the country close in on $50 billion.

This week, Apple disclosed it's building a data center in the Chinese province of Guizhou, as part of a broader plan to invest $1 billion in the region. Though the data center could improve the performance of iCloud services Apple delivers to its now-massive Chinese user base, the company's primary motivation appears to be a wish to comply with a new Chinese cybersecurity law that among other things restricts the movement of Chinese users' data outside of the mainland.

The law effectively means that user content such as photos, documents and messages need to be stored on Chinese servers. Apple will retain control over its new data center's encryption keys. However, as the Wall Street Journal notes, it isn't clear if the company will have access to stored data, given that a company owned by Guizhou's provincial government will be operating the facility.

This isn't the first time that Apple has gone out of its way to keep Chinese regulators happy. In 2014, the company agreed to store some of its data at China Telecom Corp.  (CHA) facilities to address security concerns. And its Chinese App Store has been willing to remove apps that have draws the ire of Beijing regulators. The Apple News app was blocked in 2015, and the New York Times' app was pulled last December.

Many of Apple's Chinese investments are also arguably done with political goals in mind, even if they're not the only reason that they're made. The company's Guizhou spending plans follows a March commitment to spend over $500 million on Chinese R&D centers, and a $1 billion 2016 investment in Chinese ride-sharing leader Didi Chuxing.

In addition, Apple PR efforts within China show a high level of sensitivity to both public and government opinion. In 2013, CEO Tim Cook issued a formal apology to Chinese customers for Apple's warranty policies, a week after state-run media began criticizing the company over the matter. The only instance of Cook issuing an apology like that outside of China was in 2012, over the botched Apple Maps launch. And while Apple has been outspoken at times on U.S. political issues, it has mostly avoided publicly criticizing Beijing's policies.

To be fair, just as Apple has strong incentives to keep the Chinese government pleased, the reverse is also true. The company employs a substantial number of Chinese workers via its R&D centers and retail stores, and more importantly is indirectly responsible for hundreds of thousands by having the lion's share of its hardware manufacturing done in China, via contract manufacturers such as Foxconn and Pegatron. The many subsidies and perks local governments have provided (generally with Beijing's approval) to contract manufacturers building iPhone plants show that appeasement is very much a two-way street.

Regardless, there's quite a contrast between Apple's conciliatory approach towards Beijing and Google's fairly uncompromising stance. Google shuttered its mainland Chinese search engine in 2010 rather than continue censoring its services, and to this day, most of its core services remain blocked by China's "Great Firewall." Thus, while over 80% of Chinese smartphones run Android, they largely come with non-Google apps and services pre-installed.

Google still has advertising and R&D offices in mainland China, and -- like Facebook Inc. (FB) , which is also blocked on the mainland -- sells ads to Chinese firms looking to reach overseas buyers. And there have been occasional reports about a Chinese Google Play launch possibly happening. But for now, Google's interactions with Chinese consumers are mostly restricted to those using VPNs to circumvent the Great Firewall...and even that option might not be around for long.

The financial implications of Apple and Google's incredibly different Chinese strategies aren't hard to grasp. Whereas China appears to account for a small percentage of Google's revenue, even after accounting for ad sales to local businesses, Apple's Greater China revenue (it covers mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan) totaled $48.5 billion in fiscal 2016, or 22% of total revenue.

The iPhone undoubtedly accounted for a big portion of these sales -- with IDC estimating 44.9 million iPhones were sold in mainland China in calendar 2016, the region's iPhone revenue last year may have been close to $30 billion. But the App Store also seems to have been a key contributor. Analytics firm App Annie believes Chinese App Store publisher payouts more than doubled annually in Q4 2016 to over $2 billion, leading China to surpass the U.S. and Japan as the world's most valuable iOS app market.

Perhaps more than any other Apple business, the App Store shines a light on the consequences of Apple and Google's very different approaches to China. Google Play is the App Store's primary rival in nearly all non-Chinese markets, and (though its monetization rates trail the App Store's) a pretty successful one overall. But in China, Google Play is virtually non-existent -- locally-sold Android phones typically come with app stores from the likes of Baidu Inc. (BIDU) , Tencent and Qihoo 360 -- while the App Store has grown into a 10-figure business.

One can argue at length about the ethical and political merits of Apple's Chinese strategy relative to Google's. But it's hard to argue about its financial merits.

Columnist Conversations

KMX is heading for a nice finish. The stock is up just over 2.7% and is one of the top ten gainers in the SP 5...

BEST IDEAS

REAL MONEY'S BEST IDEAS

News Breaks

Powered by

BROKERAGE PARTNERS

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.


TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.