Looks Like 2000 Is in Play

 | Apr 04, 2014 | 7:48 AM EDT
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print
Stock quotes in this article:














Is it a collar? Is it a basket? In 2000, the operative period I am now using for the new tech portion of the Nasdaq, I used to see the pressure on the whole "complex" like I saw yesterday, and I had a sixth sense of what was going on. I knew someone was getting short or getting hedged against some Internet-dominated positions.

I knew it because of TheStreet (TST). You see, I had made a declaration that I wasn't going to sell any stock into the downturn. Didn't seem right to me. I said that after the lock-up had expired and the stock had come down horrendously from its high the year before. The numbers are so embarrassing but oh, what the heck, you could look them up. The stock was priced at $20, opened in the $60s because of the craziness at the time and then proceeded to go down to the low-single digits, where other insiders were still selling.

The brokers, always clever, were telling me that if I didn't want to sell TheStreet stock, they could lock me into a short basket of similar stocks. They said that they could offset my downside. They had come up with other stocks that traded in similar fashion to TheStreet, and it would be easy to bet against them to cut off my downside.

I think yesterday was basket day, either for some insider or for some hedge fund. Or for many insiders and many hedge funds that either saw their gains evaporating, or wanted to play the downside of a group that had become hapless and weak after having been viciously powerful.

That's how you get remarkably horrible performances from stocks like Salesforce.com (CRM), Workday (WDAY), Veeva (VEEV), Concur (CNQR), ServiceNow (NOW), Facebook (FB), Yelp (YELP) and the like. They all trade together, so they were a natural basket for some entrepreneurial broker to put together.

That can also explain why they didn't and couldn't lift. You can't stop the process in between. The brokers putting on these baskets are indifferent to the declines they are generating, because their only job is to finish the job. That's why it simply didn't matter how low the stocks went. It didn't entice buyers, because has you stepped up and bought you would have been overwhelmed and gotten a report that was much higher than where the stock was at the time.

This kind of activity went on all the way down in 2000. It never stopped. It was like a hidden cancer that operated on all of the stocks at once. I don't think I would have ever understood it was happening, however, if I hadn't been pitched it.

Sure it's possible they'll bounce. There were natural sellers everywhere betting that a strong employment number would cause these stocks to get crushed again, because the money needs to go into leveraged old tech with earnings, and not unleveraged new tech with insider selling.

But if 2000 is in play, and I think it is, someone's now short or hedged against a crash landing for the group. And we all have to deal with a phenomenon that -- if it is like 2000 -- is just getting started, and was nowhere near complete at 4 p.m. EDT yesterday.



News Breaks

Powered by


Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.