Climbing Into P&G

 | Feb 15, 2012 | 11:00 AM EST
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print
Stock quotes in this article:










This column from ETF Profits is being posted here as a bonus for Real Money readers. For a trial of ETF Profitsclick here.

When I'm looking for viable trade setups, one of the highest-probability ones I can identify involves Fibonacci relationships coming together on both the time and price axes of the name. Before I give you a more current setup, I'll go over one that's already getting close to the initial upside target for the move: a time and price setup in Under Armour (UA).

Under Armour tested a key Fibonacci price support cluster ($67.83 to $70.01) into a cluster of timing relationships that came due between Dec. 21 and Dec. 26. The actual low was made on Dec. 21 at $69.69. Within days of that low, we saw our first buy triggers suggesting an entry for a swing trade.

Under Armour (UA) -- Daily
Source: Dynamic Trader

Since then, Under Armour shares have continued to rally toward an upside target that comes in at the $92.22 area (1.272 Fibonacci extension of the Oct. 31 high to the Dec. 21 low). Right now, I am still looking at buying pullbacks in Under Armour so long as the stock holds above the Dec. 21 high and doesn't meet the ideal target around $92.22.

Even though there is still potentially more upside on that trade setup, let's look at a similar play that's still a bit closer to the beginning of the move than it is to the end. I'm thinking of Procter & Gamble (PG), a sizable component of a number of ETFs -- including Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR (XLP) at 13.4% of the portfolio, Vanguard Consumer Staples (VDC) at 11.9% and iShares Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Sector (IYK) at 11.6%.

In P&G, I still consider the larger trend to be upward as long as price holds above the Nov. 25 low. I prefer trend trades, so I'd like to set up the buy side. As far as the price support is concerned, I was looking at a relatively wide zone, from $61.17 to $62.60. Actually, there were a few levels that came in above $62.60 -- but, once they were violated, I deleted them from my chart, as they were no longer valid as possible support.

Procter & Gamble (PG) -- Daily
Source: Dynamic Trader

As far as Fibonacci timing cycles go, I was looking at the confluence of cycles that came due between Feb. 1 and Feb. 3. The actual low was made at $62.56 on Feb. 3, directly on top of key support. This was follow by what I use as a "buy trigger" to enter for a possible swing trade. If the price continues to hold above the Feb. 3 low, I'll look at the pullbacks in P&G, seeking buy entries for a possible move to target 1 -- $68.21. If target 1 is met, $69.74 would be target 2.

But if, instead, the Feb. 3 low is taken out, the trade setup will become a bust. At least we know what our risk is on the trade!

Columnist Conversations

Equity futures were up slightly just before 9:30 PM Sunday night.
Spent a good amount of time with PayPal CEO Dan Schulman this week...and came away fully understanding why thi...
Has quietly taken a mini beating over the past few weeks. Might be worth a look on Monday given everything tha...



News Breaks

Powered by


Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.

TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.