Swiss Stand Firm on Insider Trading

 | Jan 06, 2012 | 9:15 AM EST  | Comments
  • Comment
  • Print Print
  • Print

It's not often you get to compare Switzerland and the United States (fondue vs. Velveeta, knives vs. guns, efficient train service vs. Amtrak), but the latest controversy surrounding Swiss National Bank President Philipp Hildebrand affords us that rare opportunity.

Hildebrand is feeling the heat after it was revealed his wife used Swiss francs to buy $504,000 three weeks ahead of Switzerland capping the franc. That netted her a nice profit, which has since been given to charity.

My first instinct on just seeing the headlines was that this guy is toast. But I was clearly thinking from the American point of view. Ben Bernanke is called treasonous and warned to stay outta Texas for quantitative easing. If one of his family were found to be shorting the greenback he wouldn't have time for an emotional press conference. He may be on the first plane to Gitmo.

But the Swiss have a different idea about privacy and banking and Hildebrand managed to carry that spirit through an entire press conference (admittedly while sweating like Albert Brooks in "Broadcast News") where he said he wouldn't step down.

Hildebrand said he didn't know his wife had made the trade (a former finance professional, she said the dollar was too low to pass up buying) and that his privacy had been breached. He also said he didn't break any rules. Actually the SNB hadn't even released its rules until this story broke. The message from the central bank is that it's basically none of the country's business what the bankers do.

But here's where I see some similarity with the U.S. Both countries refuse to really come clean on their currency plans – just for different reasons. The Swiss cite privacy and the Americans just don't trust their citizens.

For a long time now (most prevalent under John Snow, who changed the definition of "strong" to "hard to counterfeit" in 2003) the Treasury Department has just repeated the phrase that a strong dollar is in the interests of the United States. Now any diversion from that meaningless statement would be a monumental policy shift. It's not even clear if the Treasury has a currency plan now or if it's all under the Fed. But it is clear that politicians don't trust voters to make an informed decision and that there would just be too much backlash if a Cabinet member said a weak dollar would be smart to, say, help exports. 

Cue Super PAC ads galore accusing the administration of weakening America's money. And then the Bureau of Engraving printing a dollar that can't be torn in half.

Columnist Conversations

HP
Multiple downside targets have been met in HP....either trail stops down or book some profits or BOTH. ...
What an ugly short session for oil and energy related stocks. Think we get some sort of bounce on Monday when...
I saw a comment on JC's piece asking about a tariff on crude oil to protect the American industry and a respon...
Lang:
i was double-delighted to see Stephanie Link bullish on LULU but also a recent piece by Ed Ponsi reflecting th...

BEST IDEAS

REAL MONEY'S BEST IDEAS

Columnist Tweets

BROKERAGE PARTNERS

Except as otherwise indicated, quotes are delayed. Quotes delayed at least 20 minutes for all exchanges. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings and ratings provided by Zacks. Mutual fund data provided by Valueline. ETF data provided by Lipper. Powered and implemented by Interactive Data Managed Solutions.


TheStreet Ratings updates stock ratings daily. However, if no rating change occurs, the data on this page does not update. The data does update after 90 days if no rating change occurs within that time period.

IDC calculates the Market Cap for the basic symbol to include common shares only. Year-to-date mutual fund returns are calculated on a monthly basis by Value Line and posted mid-month.